An analysis of the topic of the group polarization and competition in political behavior

But if we do get through all that, " We will have the unique opportunity to learn first-hand from the most hi-tech, research data-backed, psychological Excerpts from the essay below. To me it's like accounting - what good is it unless it tells you how to stay in the green, out of the red?

An analysis of the topic of the group polarization and competition in political behavior

Overview[ edit ] Group polarization is an important phenomenon in social psychology and is observable in many social contexts. For example, a group of women who hold moderately feminist views tend to demonstrate heightened pro-feminist beliefs following group discussion.

Psychologists have found that social media outlets such as Facebook and Twitter demonstrate that group polarization can occur even when a group is not physically together. As long as the group of individuals begins with the same fundamental opinion on the topic and a consistent dialogue is kept going, group polarization can occur.

However, in situations where groups are somewhat newly formed and tasks are new, group polarization can demonstrate a more profound influence on the decision-making. Reinforcement theorySelective exposure theoryand Subjective validation Attitude polarization, also known as belief polarization and polarization effect, is a phenomenon in which a disagreement becomes more extreme as the different parties consider evidence on the issue.

It is one of the effects of confirmation bias: InCharles LordLee Ross and Mark Lepper [9] performed a study in which they selected two groups of people, one group strongly in favor of capital punishmentthe other strongly opposed.

The researchers initially measured the strength with which people held their position.

Alternative Names

Later, both the pro- and anti-capital punishment people were put into small groups and shown one of two cards, each containing a statement about the results of a research project written on it.

Kroner and Phillips compared murder rates for the year before and the year after adoption of capital punishment in 14 states. In 11 of the 14 states, murder rates were lower after adoption of the death penalty.

This research supports the deterrent effect of the death penalty.

A Manifesto Against the Enemies of Modernity - Areo

Palmer and Crandall compared murder rates in 10 pairs of neighboring states with different capital punishment laws. In 8 of the 10 pairs, murder rates were higher in the state with capital punishment. This research opposes the deterrent effect of the death penalty.

Finally, the trial was rerun on all participants using a card that supported the opposite position to that they had initially seen. This suggests that a general phenomenon of choice-shifts exists apart from only risk-related decisions.

An analysis of the topic of the group polarization and competition in political behavior

The study found that situations that normally favor the more risky alternative increased risky shifts. More so, situations that normally favor the cautious alternative increased cautious shifts.

A Manifesto Against the Enemies of Modernity. by James A. Lindsay and Helen Pluckrose; Posted on August 22, February 2, ; This document is very long and detailed so a brief bulleted summary is provided below for those who don’t have the hour it takes for a careful read. That seems different, though, because it requires rejecting one ideology/ingroup, namely Catholicism. It makes sense that people identifying as Catholic would resent that the Protestants found a way to weaken Catholicism, and apparently people who “took the soup” were ostracized. Social psychology is the scientific study of how people's thoughts, feelings, and behaviors are influenced by the actual, imagined, or implied presence of others. In this definition, scientific refers to the empirical investigation using the scientific terms thoughts, feelings, and behavior refer to psychological variables that can be measured in humans.

These findings also show the importance of previous group shifts. Choice shifts are mainly explained by largely differing human values and how highly these values are held by an individual. According to Moscovici et al. While an extremist in the group may sway opinion, the shift can only occur with sufficient and proper interaction within the group.

In other words, the extremist will have no impact without interaction. Also, Moscovici et al. This finding demonstrates how one opinion in the group will not sway the group; it is the combination of all the individual opinions that will make an impact.

In early studies, the risky-shift phenomenon was measured using a scale known as the Choice-Dilemmas Questionnaire. This measure required participants to consider a hypothetical scenario in which an individual is faced with a dilemma and must make a choice to resolve the issue at hand. Participants were then asked to estimate the probability that a certain choice would be of benefit or risk to the individual being discussed.

Consider the following example: A, an electrical engineer, who is married and has one child, has been working for a large electronics corporation since graduating from college five years ago.

He is assured of a lifetime job with a modest, though adequate, salary and liberal pension benefits upon retirement. On the other hand, it is very unlikely that his salary will increase much before he retires.

While attending a convention, Mr. A is offered a job with a small, newly founded company which has a highly uncertain future.

The new job would pay more to start and would offer the possibility of a share in the owner- ship if the company survived the competition of the larger firms.

They would then be provided with a series of probabilities that indicate whether the new company that offered him a position is financially stable. It would read as following "Please check the lowest probability that you would consider acceptable to make it worthwhile for Mr.

A to take the new job.


A should not take the new job no matter what the probabilities. Individuals completed the questionnaire and made their decisions independently of others. Later, they would be asked to join a group to reassess their choices.

Indicated by shifts in the mean value, initial studies using this method revealed that group decisions tended to be relatively riskier than those that were made by individuals.refugees choosing not to return to their rural homes but to settle instead in the cities, primarily Kigali. Linguistic Affiliation.

Kinyarwanda is a unifying factor within Rwanda, since it is . Overview. Group polarization is an important phenomenon in social psychology and is observable in many social contexts. For example, a group of women who hold moderately feminist views tend to demonstrate heightened pro-feminist beliefs following group discussion.

Similarly, have shown that after deliberating together, mock jury members often decided on punitive damage awards that were either.

Knowledge Base

The Psychology of Groups By Donelson R. Forsyth. University of Richmond. This module assumes that a thorough understanding of people requires a thorough understanding of groups. Preliminary versions of economic research. Did Consumers Want Less Debt? Consumer Credit Demand Versus Supply in the Wake of the Financial Crisis.

Political divisions over policy options create barriers to addressing global warming. • Australian voters respond to the position of political leaders on climate change policy. Table of Contents. Vic Biorseth, Tuesday, July 30, This webpage was inspired by comments from John of Escondido, California, whose motivating comments can be seen after the Of Lies and Liars webpage.

John recommended an "executive summary" of each webpage, which seemed at first to present a daunting task.

Publications | Levy Economics Institute